My Continued Thoughts on Akame Ga Kill, episodes 4-8; Death As A Plot Device; I Am So Triggered!

So, now that I’ve continued watching past the first few episodes, I have happened upon the episode which has finally made the reasoning behind the anime’s reputation as a gut wrenching death show, clear to me. For those who have not seen the show, I shall leave the names out of it for the sake of spoilers, but throughout the first six episodes, a certain character was being slightly developed, with a sudden spike in development in episode 6, which was well received by me. I liked the character, and the development given her. In episode 6, this character is shot, bisected, and dies suddenly, and sacrificially, an event which would increase the motivation of the revolutionary faction which the main character is a part of, which is called Night Raid. This character who died protecting another Night Raid Member, was my very favorite character in the show til then, due to the amount of pathos written into her. The fact that this character was finished off so quickly, suddenly, and without showcasing her full powers, or even fulfill her full story arc before dying, seemed like such a slap in the face to me, that I am tempted to think that the writing of Akame Ga Kill is less than exemplary, rather it is somewhat to be deplored after a certain fashion. It is taking a viable favorite character of many people, and making her an “expendable crewman,” to make people understand that the situation is serious. I understand that this death gives the plot a bit more weight, and adds one more reason why the main characters should bear a grudge against the antagonists, but having more character development, and even just a bit more screen time for this person would have drastically improved the emotional impact of their death later, and left me satisfied with her death. To prove this point, another member of Night Raid dies some episodes later, yet that was not anywhere near as traumatic to the viewer, nor such a smack in the face, as the death of the previous member, owing to the fact that this next character got at least 8 episodes worth of character development, each with active screen time in each episode to give them depth. (Sigh) It may be that my liking the character that died in episode 6 somewhat clouds my judgement, but I also liked the second character who died, and yet I was OK with it. They both were really interesting, lovable characters with cool designs according to my taste; the one just got a cool, mournful, noble death while the other got a sudden, disruptive, and somewhat humiliating one, being too quick for me to really appreciate what’s happening, and too bitter for the audience to be able to actually move on from their death. This is what I would call, a cheap way to engage the audience. “Introduce a really interesting, lively character with a backstory which could be awesome when fully revealed, but only reveal a tiny bit of it, get everyone interested, and then kill them off before anyone knows what hit ’em. Yeah, that’ll get the viewers cryin’. I can hear the money just pourin’ in.” Well, I can hear some television-mob bosses quoting those words even now. But if one were to take one quick look on IMDB for episode 6, entitled “Kill the Absolute Justice,” ( by the way, yes all the episodes are entitled with “Kill the-” at the beginning,) one would quickly find that this episode, where a lovable character is killed off too quickly for us to appreciate them, is rated at least a whole point higher than the episodes immediately before or after it! This ploy, which I know from American television is an old, tired, and despicably cliched plot device, is one which invariably works. Lost did it, Breaking Bad did it, and now The Walking Dead and Game of Thrones are doing it. Now, the thing is, this tactic definitely immediately freezes that scene, that episode, the characters, and basically the rest of the show in your mind, making the show immediately a memorable one, if for the wrong reasons. I must remind myself that this tactic is not always a horrible one. If done right, it can cause a show to feel truly perilous, like no one has plot armor, and who knows what might happen next. I feel like Attack on Titan, which I actually really like as one of my favorites, (that tells you something about me) actually did do this plot device justice, because while people continuously died left and right, there was always a disturbing reason for it, and the fact that people died did not always serve the plot, but it served the reality of the world. It gave you the feeling that this is a place and a situation where humanity, while safe for the moment, is being put in the position of imminent extinction by horrible monsters, and no-one knows why or how it is happening, so sudden, meaningless deaths are a matter of course, just like in real war. Also, another thing these quick-emotional-deaths have going for them in AoT, is that all of the characters who die are secondary characters who you are immediately able to empathize with, no matter how much development is given them, and also, if they are given development, then it is always enough for you to be able to properly feel like you’ve known the character long enough now to let them go. You are never forced to accept the sudden death of a close companion of the main characters, and I have not yet had to accept the death of my dear glutton Sasha, at leat, not yet. But, for that character that just died in Akame Ga Kill, I’m still burning with anger that I was not able to see much more of her in the show as she so desperately deserved and needed as a character. Now, while all that negativity has been said, I still was not put off by this death enough to make me want to quit watching it, it did not disgust me to that degree. I immediately understood the type of show that this would be from here on out, one which murders its beautifully crafted characters with extreme prejudice for the purpose of plot convenience and quick thrills, and if they can use this trope more effectively, then I am still up for the ride. Indeed, in the very next story arc there was another death of a very close member of the cast, and yet that one was done with elegance and grace, giving you at least two more episodes to prepare you for what was to come. Will this show be able to keep up that elegance and grace? We shall see, next time. Thanks for reading and joining me on my viewing experience.

5 comments

  1. (Gurren Lagann spoilers) I would bring up that the death of Kamina in Gurren Lagann never struck me as a ratings ploy because it was integral to the plot and the development of the characters. Indeed it is hard to imagine Simon becoming the man that he becomes without the death of his best bro Kamina. Here is the devastating death of character well without the bounds of the inexpendable, and he dies suddenly and early on, but only after his character and everyone’s reliance on him is fully established.
    (Breaking Bad spoilers) I would also bring up that I cannot remember in Breaking Bad an instance of what you are here discussing. All the deaths seemed well warranted and I can’t remember any well-loved characters dying until the end. All the deaths I remember are the deaths of villains who generally garner no sympathy, and the meaningless deaths of meaningless cronies, who only garner sympathy by how meaningless the cause of their deaths sometimes are.
    As for The Walking Dead I can confirm that this ploy takes place. Almost once per episode, and that you can usually tell that a character is going to die because they suddenly bring our attention to their backstory and anything else that could make us care for them.

    Like

  2. (Gurren Lagann spoilers) I would bring up that the death of Kamina in Gurren Lagann never struck me as a ratings ploy because it was integral to the plot and the development of the characters. Indeed it is hard to imagine Simon becoming the man that he becomes without the death of his best bro Kamina. Here is the devastating death of a character well within the bounds of the inexpendable, and he dies suddenly and early on, but only after his character and everyone’s reliance on him is fully established.
    (Breaking Bad spoilers) I would also bring up that I cannot remember in Breaking Bad an instance of what you are here discussing. All the deaths seemed well-warranted and I can’t remember any well-loved characters dying until the end. All the deaths I remember in the beginning and middle of the series are the deaths of villains who generally garner no sympathy, and the meaningless deaths of meaningless cronies, who only garner sympathy by how meaningless the cause of their deaths sometimes are.
    As for The Walking Dead I can confirm that this ploy takes place. Almost once per episode, and that you can usually tell that a character is going to die because they suddenly bring our attention to their backstory and anything else that could make us care for them.

    Like

    1. Mhmm. Yes, I feel like Akame Ga Kill wanted that same sort of integral plot development you speak of, but did not want to take the time required to make it more concrete and sensible. It does feel a lot more like, “Oh, that person’s getting backstory and flashbacks, guess they’re gonna die.” Also, with Breaking Bad, I have not made a concerted effort to watch it, but I only read the complaints of people who did saying that it did have this death ploy in it. Maybe they are simply wierdy’s who get emotionally invested in the bad-guys. And yeah, I don’t need to see the walking dead to know what it’s like in this department. /:)

      Like

Leave a reply to philipberggren Cancel reply